Colorado Nursing Home Administrators (NHA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Colorado Nursing Home Administrators Exam with confidence. Engage with a variety of quiz questions designed to enhance your knowledge and skills for the exam. Hone your abilities and get ready for success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


When are alternatives available for the two-hour fire separation wall?

  1. When there are adjoining occupancies by licensed health care entities and all are directly owned by one of the licensees or share the same governing body

  2. When both entities agree on an alternative plan

  3. When the wall is unnecessary for fire protection

  4. When the separation requirement is under review

The correct answer is: When there are adjoining occupancies by licensed health care entities and all are directly owned by one of the licensees or share the same governing body

In the context of fire safety regulations in nursing homes, the correct answer is option A. This is because when there are adjoining occupancies by licensed health care entities and all are directly owned by one of the licensees or share the same governing body, alternatives may be available for the two-hour fire separation wall. This exception recognizes that in some cases where multiple healthcare entities are under the same ownership or governing body, the need for a two-hour fire separation wall may be reassessed without compromising safety standards. This exception allows for flexibility in fire safety measures while ensuring that the necessary precautions are still in place. Options B, C, and D are not correct in this context. Option B's requirement for both entities to agree on an alternative plan does not align with the specific conditions outlined in the question. Option C's suggestion that the wall may be unnecessary for fire protection is not a valid reason to forego fire safety requirements. Option D's mention of the separation requirement being under review does not automatically warrant alternatives for the two-hour fire separation wall without meeting the specific criteria mentioned in option A.